:novee-gym: Elite AI hackers aren’t born. They’re trained.

Join the Novee Gym

:novee-gym: Elite AI hackers aren’t born. They’re trained.

Join the Novee Gym

Novee vs. Bright Security

Developer-embedded scanning tests what developers configure, but attackers target exactly what no one thought to test.

Bright Security embeds DAST in the developer workflow, built for developers configuring tests, not security teams running offensive programs. Novee starts from a domain and tests autonomously, the way an attacker would.

See Novee in action

Thank you!

We’ll be in touch as soon as we can.

Chosen by teams that take attackers seriously

Novee vs. Bright Security at a glance

Challenges with Bright Security

Scanning in the developer workflow is useful, but developer-configured testing optimizes for convenience, not the coverage attackers exploit.

Challenges with Bright Security:

  • Developer-first is the ceiling.

    Bright is built for dev teams who want security in their workflow, not security teams running offensive programs.
  • Automated, but developer-configured.

    Bright still needs developers to set up and maintain test suites, so someone has to decide what gets tested, which means deciding what quietly goes untested.
  • No compounding context between scans.

    Each scan runs independently and starts fresh, so Bright never builds a lasting model of your application, and coverage repeats rather than deepening over time.
  • No proprietary offensive model.

    Bright runs on third-party AI, so its reasoning is bounded by general-purpose models rather than an offensive engine trained on how real attackers actually think and operate today.
  • No mobile coverage.

    Bright tests web, API, and AI apps, but leaves mobile out entirely, so a whole class of your attack surface goes untested against threats.

Why Novee Over Bright Security?

Real coverage isn’t what a developer thinks to configure, it’s what an attacker would actually reach, proven, chained, and tied to a verified fix.

Where Novee goes further:

  • Autonomous from a domain name.

    Novee needs no developer setup and no test suites to maintain, it just runs on its own.
  • Tests what attackers target, not what devs configure.

    Developers scope scans around what they know to check, so they configure what to miss. Novee maps the full attack surface an attacker would probe.
  • Depth through chained attack paths.

    Bright validates one finding at a time. Novee proves each through three independent blind agents, then chains findings across your business logic into the real attack paths that lead to breaches.
  • A living model of your app.

    Novee's Asset Intelligence Model captures your roles, workflows, APIs, and business logic and deepens every cycle, so coverage compounds instead of resetting.
  • Predictable per-asset pricing.

    Priced by complexity, not enterprise SaaS tiers, so depth and frequency never get rationed by budget.
  • A proprietary offensive model.

    Novee owns its own offensive reasoning model, purpose-trained on attacker tradecraft, not a third-party AI wrapper.

Novee vs. Bright Security Across Key Areas

Capability Novee AI Pentesting Bright Security
Autonomous execution

Automated but developer-configured. Developers set up and maintain test suites, so testing runs only where they point it.

Testing depth

Developers configure the scan, so coverage reflects what they thought to test, not attacker behavior.

Validation architecture

Validates exploitability one finding at a time, but with no independent blind re-validation and no chaining across business logic.

Compounding application context

Each scan runs independently, starts fresh, so context never compounds across runs.

Offensive AI stack

Runs on third-party AI; no proprietary model.

Coverage

Web, API, and AI apps, but no mobile coverage at all.

Continuous, change-triggered testing

Embedded directly in CI/CD, running continuously within the pipeline.

Workflow and CI/CD Integration

Strong CI/CD and developer-workflow integration, its core design and a genuine strength.

What security leaders say

“As the leading agentic orchestration platform for the enterprise, data isolation between our customers is non-negotiable. We need to prove that continuously, not once a year. Novee adapted to our multi-tenant SaaS product within days.”

Scott Roberts
CISO
john

“Our pen tests took weeks and consistently missed critical issues. Novee found them immediately and gave us instant remediation guidance. It showed us what we'd been missing.”

John Barrow
CISO

"Traditional DAST produced either zero or irrelevant results. We needed something that could identify complex vulnerabilities like server-side request forgery. Novee consistently surfaces findings we simply weren't seeing before."

Robert Kugler
Head of Security, IT & Compliance

“Novee rethinks penetration testing for how attacks actually happen today. Continuous, attacker-level validation that proves what’s exploitable and shows teams exactly how to fix it is a meaningful shift for modern security programs.”

Troy Wilkinson
Former Fortune 500 CISO
tamir ronen

"The hardest vulnerabilities for us to catch aren’t misconfigurations or known patterns. They’re business logic issues that only show up when someone understands how the application is supposed to work. That’s exactly the gap Novee closes."

Tamir Ronen
CISO, HiBob

"We had EASM tools and manual pentests that produced mostly noise. Novee came in black-box with zero credentials and within days found dozens of real vulnerabilities we could actually fix."

Itzik Menashe
CISO, Global VP IT InfoSec & productivity

“As an AI researcher, what stood out about Novee is that they built a proprietary offensive AI model designed to think like an attacker, rather than wrapping generic LLMs. That matters for enterprise-grade results.”

Tal Shapira
PhD, CTO

“This was by far the deepest and fastest security assessment we’ve had. Novee uncovered issues across our web and mobile applications that had gone undetected before, and the level of depth was unlike anything we’d seen from other vendors.”

Amir Tito
CISO

“We had urgent compliance need and we couldn’t wait weeks for DAST findings, an external exposure audit, and an in-depth pentest report. Instead Novee came in and delivered immediate value with their AI pentesting platform; with their findings, we closed our gaps and quickly met the criteria we needed for certification.”

Ron Reiter
CTO

"Before Novee, we were getting a snapshot once a year. Now we have continuous coverage across our application portfolio, we're already finding things that prior manual pentests missed completely, and I have real confidence that our security posture reflects what's actually in our environment."

Abhijeet Patkar
Cyber Security Manager

The Novee Advantages

Attacker Coverage, Not Developer Convenience

The Problem with Bright Security:

Bright lives in the developer workflow, which is exactly why its coverage has a ceiling. Developer-embedded scanning optimizes for developer convenience: the team decides which endpoints and cases to test, sets up the suites, and maintains them over time. But deciding what to test is also deciding what to skip, and attackers go straight for what nobody configured.

How Novee Widens Coverage:

Novee doesn't wait to be told what to test. Starting from your domain name, it maps the attack surface the way an adversary would, endpoints, workflows, trust boundaries, and business logic, including paths no developer would think to configure. It reasons about how your application is meant to work, then probes where that logic breaks, so coverage reflects attacker behavior, not checklists.

Autonomous From a Domain Name

The Problem with Bright Security:

Bright is automated but not autonomous. Developers still set up and maintain its test suites, so someone has to configure it before it runs.

How Novee Runs Autonomously:

Novee needs a domain name, nothing else. No credentials, no source code, no test suites to build or maintain as your application changes. It maps, analyzes, plans, hunts, validates, and fixes on its own, adapting continuously as the environment evolves. There's nothing for your developers to stand up or babysit, which means coverage never depends on someone remembering to update a suite, and testing never quietly narrows to a months-old config.

Depth Through Chained Attack Paths

The Problem with Bright Security:

Bright validates exploitability, which sounds like Novee's territory, but it does so one finding at a time: each vulnerability gets a pass or fail on its own. There's no independent blind re-validation, and no chaining of findings across your business logic into the multi-step paths attackers actually use.

How Novee Proves Depth:

Novee proves every finding through three independent agents, one exploits, a second re-exploits blind with no shared context, a third validates, with deterministic checks where possible. Then it goes further, chaining validated findings across your application's logic into the multi-step attack paths that lead to breaches. That's depth and confidence, not pass/fail.