:novee-gym: Elite AI hackers aren’t born. They’re trained.

Step into the gym at Black Hat 2026.

:novee-gym: Elite AI hackers aren’t born. They’re trained.

Step into the gym at Black Hat 2026.

Novee vs. Aikido

A broad scanner and a compliance report don't find the flaws attackers actually chain into breaches.

Aikido is an AppSec scanner with brand recognition, but their pentesting capability is a compliance-driven bolt-on. Novee meets compliance and keeps your environment secure by finding, proving, and verifying vulnerabilities that lead to breaches.

See Novee in action

Thank you!

We’ll be in touch as soon as we can.

Chosen by teams that take attackers seriously

Novee vs. Aikido at a glance

Challenges with Aikido

Aikido’s new pentesting offering is real but shallow, focused on compliance and targeting developers, not security teams. It’s a mechanism to generate SOC 2/ISO 27001 PDF reports.

Challenges with Aikido:

  • No proprietary offensive model.

    Aikido runs on third-party AI. The reasoning ceiling is set by general models it doesn't own or optimize.
  • Pentesting is a bolt-on, not the core product.

    Aikido is an AppSec scanner that added pentesting, targeted at developers and driven by compliance. It’s framed around generating SOC 2 and ISO 27001 PDFs, not finding breaches.
  • No compounding context.

    Aikido runs the same depth on every scan. Without a living model of how your application works, testing never gets deeper or more targeted, cycle after cycle.
  • Lighter validation.

    Aikido returns findings, but with no confirmed independent multi-agent validation and unclear depth of proof, more room is left for false positives and unverified risk to reach your security team.
  • Per-assessment pricing.

    Aikido charges per assessment or per deploy. That model rations testing: the more you test, the more it costs.

Why Novee Over Aikido?

Offensive testing is only as valuable as the breaches it can find, how confidently you can act on them, and whether the fix held.

Where Novee goes further:

  • A proprietary offensive AI stack.

    Novee post-trained its own offensive reasoning model on real attacker tradecraft, and orchestrates it with best-in-class frontier models using a proprietary harness. Owning and optimizing the entire AI stack means maximized efficiency gains and accuracy.
  • Validation built for zero false positives.

    Every finding runs through three independent agents. One exploits, a second re-exploits blind with no shared context, a third validates independently, with deterministic checks inserted where possible. If any stage fails, it's never reported. Every finding comes with a working exploit, replication steps, and a PoC script. You get the benefits of a closed compliance report, and the assurance the novel vulnerabilities in your system are secured.
  • Predictable per-asset pricing.

    Depth and frequency don't cost extra, so continuous, deep testing never gets rationed against a budget.
  • Purpose-built for offensive testing.

    Every layer is engineered to find breaches, not generate a compliance PDF or pass a scan.
  • A closed loop to a verified fix.

    Remediation is tailored to your WAF, backend, and codebase, not generic OWASP references. Once a fix ships, Novee retests automatically to confirm it held, and checks for new risks the change introduced.
  • Built into your workflow.

    Native CI/CD and change-triggered testing fire the moment code ships. Connected to CI/CD, fixes go to the code level, aligned to your actual codebase.

Novee vs. Aikido Across Key Areas

Capability Novee AI Pentesting Aikido
Application depth & business logic

Compliance-driven scanning, with no evidence of business logic chaining.

Product focus

An AppSec scanner with pentesting added as a bolt-on; targeted at developers and framed around SOC 2 / ISO 27001 reporting.

Offensive AI stack

No proprietary model. Runs on 3rd-party AI.

Compounding context

No compounding context; runs the same depth on every scan.

Validation

Returns findings, but with no confirmed multi-agent validation and unclear depth of proof.

Closed-loop remediation & retesting

No confirmed stack-specific remediation or automatic retesting.

Autonomous, continuous testing

Partial autonomy; continuous testing is still evolving.

Pricing

Per-assessment or per-deploy, from $4K to $30K and up.

What security leaders say

“As the leading agentic orchestration platform for the enterprise, data isolation between our customers is non-negotiable. We need to prove that continuously, not once a year. Novee adapted to our multi-tenant SaaS product within days.”

Scott Roberts
CISO
john

“Our pen tests took weeks and consistently missed critical issues. Novee found them immediately and gave us instant remediation guidance. It showed us what we'd been missing.”

John Barrow
CISO

"Traditional DAST produced either zero or irrelevant results. We needed something that could identify complex vulnerabilities like server-side request forgery. Novee consistently surfaces findings we simply weren't seeing before."

Robert Kugler
Head of Security, IT & Compliance

“Novee rethinks penetration testing for how attacks actually happen today. Continuous, attacker-level validation that proves what’s exploitable and shows teams exactly how to fix it is a meaningful shift for modern security programs.”

Troy Wilkinson
Former Fortune 500 CISO
tamir ronen

"The hardest vulnerabilities for us to catch aren’t misconfigurations or known patterns. They’re business logic issues that only show up when someone understands how the application is supposed to work. That’s exactly the gap Novee closes."

Tamir Ronen
CISO, HiBob

"We had EASM tools and manual pentests that produced mostly noise. Novee came in black-box with zero credentials and within days found dozens of real vulnerabilities we could actually fix."

Itzik Menashe
CISO, Global VP IT InfoSec & productivity

“As an AI researcher, what stood out about Novee is that they built a proprietary offensive AI model designed to think like an attacker, rather than wrapping generic LLMs. That matters for enterprise-grade results.”

Tal Shapira
PhD, CTO

“This was by far the deepest and fastest security assessment we’ve had. Novee uncovered issues across our web and mobile applications that had gone undetected before, and the level of depth was unlike anything we’d seen from other vendors.”

Amir Tito
CISO

“We had urgent compliance need and we couldn’t wait weeks for DAST findings, an external exposure audit, and an in-depth pentest report. Instead Novee came in and delivered immediate value with their AI pentesting platform; with their findings, we closed our gaps and quickly met the criteria we needed for certification.”

Ron Reiter
CTO

"Before Novee, we were getting a snapshot once a year. Now we have continuous coverage across our application portfolio, we're already finding things that prior manual pentests missed completely, and I have real confidence that our security posture reflects what's actually in our environment."

Abhijeet Patkar
Cyber Security Manager

The Novee Advantages

The Novee Advantage for the Proprietary Offensive Model

The Problem with Aikido:

Aikido is a broad AppSec scanner that added pentesting on top, running on third-party AI it doesn't own or optimize. Its offensive capability is bounded by general models built for everything and nothing in particular, which is why its testing stays compliance-driven and shallow. It’s good for a report, not for finding the breaches that attackers actually chain together.

How Novee Goes Further:

Novee post-trained its own offensive reasoning model on real attacker tradecraft. It doesn't pattern-match against a checklist, it reasons and chains vulnerabilities across your business logic the way a human attacker would. Orchestrated with best-in-class frontier models selected per task (using a proprietary model harness) and purpose-built for offensive application security, it finds the authorization gaps and chained attack paths that shallow compliance scanning simply never reaches.

The Novee Advantage for Validation and False-Positive Triage

The Problem with Aikido:

Aikido returns findings, but with no confirmed multi-agent validation and unclear depth, fewer independent checks stand between a false positive and your team.<br />

How Novee Improves Signal-to-Noise:

Every suspected vulnerability runs through three independent agents – a finder, a validator, and a blind re-validator with no context from the first two – backed by deterministic checks wherever exploitability can be confirmed by execution rather than inference. If any stage fails, the finding never surfaces. Every issue that reaches your team arrives proven, with a working exploit, replication steps, and a PoC script. No false positives by design, no manual triage.

The Novee Advantage for Closing the Loop

The Problem with Aikido:

Aikido is built around generating compliance reports, not verified fixes. Its materials describe no stack-specific remediation and no automatic retesting, and because it runs the same depth every scan, it can't confirm a fix held or catch new risk, so closing the loop lands back on your team.

How Novee Improves Remediation:

Because the Novee Asset Intelligence Model captures your architecture and tech stack, remediation guidance is specific to your WAF, backend, and codebase and, connected to CI/CD, drops to the code level. Once a fix ships, Novee automatically retests to confirm the vulnerability is resolved and checks for new risk the change introduced.